Who were the opposing sides in the debate over ratification of the Constitution?

The opposing sides in the debate over ratification of the Constitution were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. This debate occurred in the late 18th century when the new Constitution was proposed to replace the Articles of Confederation.

Federalists supported the ratification of the Constitution, advocating for a strong national government that could effectively manage the country and provide for its defense, economic stability, and overall governance. They believed that a centralized authority would help resolve issues such as interstate disputes and ensure national unity.

On the other hand, Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution, fearing that it would lead to an overpowering central government that could infringe on individual rights and liberties. They were concerned that the proposed government lacked sufficient checks and balances and that it would diminish the power of state governments.

This historical context highlights the foundational conflict in American political thought regarding the balance of power between state and federal authority, the rights of individuals, and the effectiveness of governance, aspects that continue to be relevant in modern political discussions.