The belief that the federal courts must correct injustices that are perpetuated or ignored by other branches is known as which of the following?

The belief that federal courts have a responsibility to address and rectify injustices that other branches of government either perpetuate or overlook is known as judicial activism. This concept suggests that judges take an active role in interpreting the law to promote social justice and protect individual rights. Judicial activists may interpret the Constitution and statutes in a way that expands rights and addresses issues that may not be directly mentioned in the law but are deemed important for societal fairness.

In contrast, other options like judicial restraint emphasize a more conservative approach where courts are more hesitant to overturn laws or make sweeping changes, focusing instead on the literal interpretation of laws and respecting the decisions made by elected branches of government. Therefore, the distinguishing feature of judicial activism is its proactive stance on correcting injustices, making it the correct choice in this context.