How did President Andrew Jackson limit the power of the Supreme Court?

President Andrew Jackson is noted for taking actions that directly challenged the authority of the Supreme Court, particularly in relation to its rulings on matters of federal power and sovereignty. The most prominent example of this is Jackson's response to the Supreme Court's decision in Worcester v. Georgia (1832). In that case, the Court ruled that the state of Georgia had no authority to impose its laws on Cherokee tribal lands, affirming the sovereignty of the Native American tribes.

Jackson's approach was to refuse to enforce the Court's decision, which effectively undermined the ruling and highlighted his belief in the supremacy of federal power over judicial authority in certain situations. This act was a significant moment in U.S. history, demonstrating a clear limitation on the power of the Supreme Court. Jackson's stance indicates that he was willing to place executive power over judicial interpretations, shaping the relationship between these branches of government.

This historical context clarifies why the option regarding rejecting to enforce the Supreme Court's decision is correct, as it reflects a significant moment when the President actively influenced the balance of power within the federal government.